A Doll's House by Henrik IbsenLiterature

Where Lies the Dramatic Irony in “A Doll’s House” by Ibsen?

3 Mins read

Dramatic irony implies to the speech and action of a personality that’s guided by partial or utter misunderstanding of the truth. The character is just not consciously utilizing irony to satirize somebody. Irony is realized from conscious or unconscious speeches or actions.

The gap between the appearance and actuality about Nora’s apparently joyful life, apparently loving husband, apparently protected and comfortable past and future, and lots of such appearances are ironical on this drama. There are many cases of irony within the play.

A Doll’s House is filled with dramatic irony. For instance, Nora expresses her happiness initially of the play by saying that her husband is employed in a better post they usually want not to fear about their future. But, we see that every one that was truly the expression of the hidden nervousness for the dearth of money to repay her money owed to Krogstad. Nora has been poor. In truth, she is just not so aware of this actuality. Ironically, all of the troubles and sorrows of Nora begins together with her husband promotion and her life is totally shattered on the end. She is unconscious concerning the future, and naturally, we additionally have no idea, that her expectation subsequently goes astray.

Read About: Why “A Doll’s House” is Considered a Modern Tragedy?

The situation when Helmer talks concerning the moral degradation of Krogstad can be ironical. Helmer explains that Krogstad had dedicated earlier a forgery and he was crooked by soul. He teaches Nora that, she should not ask him to think about Krogstad’s case because such individuals contaminate their family and children with the affect of their guilt. Though, Helmer is unaware of the actual fact, Nora and readers come to know that, ironically, all his ethical teachings had been relevant to his own spouse, Nora, who has additionally committed the same crime of forgery.

It can be a case of dramatic irony when Helmer says that he’ll willingly sacrifice his happiness and dignity if some danger had been to threaten his wife. But when such a thing occurs within the subsequent moment, he seems to be an entire coward and an totally egoistic one who is not going to sacrifice something in any respect, within the name of a mere wife. The two dialogues from his own mouths will present the irony; one is his fanciful promise and the other is his response to the following situation.

This is his promise: “Let what will happen, happen. When the real crisis comes, you will not find me lacking in strength or courage. I am man enough to bear the burden for us both.”

And that is his response to actuality: “How could it help if you were gone from his world? It wouldn’t assist me…. I may easily be suspected of having been an accomplice in your crime. People may think… We must appear to be living together… But the children shall be taken out of your hands. I dare no longer entrust them to you.”

Nora is unconscious whereas telling Mrs. Linde that her husband is passionately in love together with her, and that he desires her all to himself. This additionally turns false because she learns on the end that he’s very egocentric and opportunist. Helmer is just not the identical what he seems. He seems as a moralist, a teacher, a guardian, a master, a powerful man, and so forth, however he doesn’t show any one among them. He scorns Nora accusing and criticizing that she has inherited all the bad conducts of her father. How can we attribute sacred ethical virtues to him when he himself is able to buy the blackmailer Krogstad by all his means.

There are many cases of dramatic irony, and yet another of them is striking. Nora’s comment to Helmer that all the things he does, is sort of right is ironical. The speech is ironical because, within the light of what subsequently occurs, this speech turns into totally absurd. Soon it’ll seem that his much vaunted love for Nora is just a bit of hypocrisy and an illusion and that, greater than the rest, he loves himself and the general public image of himself.

At the time of rehearsal of the Tarantella, Helmer mentioned to her that she is dancing wildly as if her life relied on the dancing. Nora responds ironically, that her life actually does depend upon it although Helmer doesn’t perceive what she means. Nora counts remaining time of her life after the rehearsal because she thinks she would sacrifice herself before her husband would sacrifice for her. Both sacrifices never happen and the theme of the play is a twisted irony to the separation and uncertainty of life. 

Suggestions? Share in the comment section.

And yes! if you need premium accounts at cheapest rate inbox me on my Facebook page at: Premium Palace

Subscribe my YouTube channel at: The Stream Post

Follow on Facebook page of Literature Times at: Literature Times on Facebook

Related posts

Literature as Expression of Thoughts, Society and Life

4 Mins read
Introduction Literature is expression of thoughts, reflection of society and reflection of life. It contains the thoughts, reflections and observations of people…

Art for Life's Sake and Moral Purpose of Literature

3 Mins read
Introduction Some say ‘art for life’s sake’ and others say ‘art for moral purpose.’ But who is right? They both are, in…

Difference between Romanticism and Classicism

3 Mins read
Introduction Romanticism is a literary and artistic movement that originated in Europe towards the end of the 18th century. Romanticism was characterized…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.