LiteratureThe Crucible by Arthur Miller

Crisis of Moral Values as Shown in The Crucible

10 Mins read

Arthur Miller and his The Crucible has acted a profound and reliable critic of recent American society and he has illustrated a significant social awareness in his plays. In this context, Miller could be in contrast with Ibsen. Like Ibsen he had the talent to compose a play upon real looking bedrock. His popularity and distinction as a dramatist is understood mainly on account of the truth that he copes with probably the most leading and mystifying issues of his period. Miller has been regarded an artist as a result of he has handled these points in such a method as to distinguish his compositions fairly clearly from the widespread sociological problem play. He has skilled these social evils and issues as dwelling points; his most profitable characters are usually not merely elements of the lifestyle however people who’re divine and values in themselves.

The Crucible is set within the village of Salem Massachusetts in 1662, Arthur Miller’s The Crucible reminds us about America of the seventeen century when there was widespread concern of witchcraft, underneath the authority of the church many innocent individuals had been tortured and put to death.

The hero, John Proctor, a farmer and a very good man, together with different good residents of Salem, is discovered responsible of witchcraft by the court. However, the decision is an injustice, representing not regulation however the malice of the group nurtured by jealousy and greed among the many citizenry and lust for energy among the many magistrates.

In reality, similar disaster is prevailing all over the place in the world, and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is one such a candid instance that reveals man can’t live with out his good name and image within the society.  In this play, the society not solely tries to subjugate the person but in addition to form his thinking means in such a manner as to make him conform its codes, whether or not proper or incorrect, good or bad. It is one thing akin to Nazism, fascism and present day communism.

Read About: McCarthyism and The Crucible

Miller’s The Crucible is an allegory of the modern social-political scenario. The play illustrates what occurs if men go away their conscience within the palms of the nation’s self-appointed keepers, how they’re made to turn on one another, how easy, day-to-day actions are interpreted as being harmful to the nation and detrimental to the society.

Miller determined to put in writing a play “which would show that the sin of public terror is that it divests man of conscience, of him.” In the play, The Crucible, John Proctor transcends the mundane of each day life by having to face a horrible choice, a choice between his name and life. He decides to take care of the purity of his name. In his short-term capitulation, he rationalizes the scenario to himself by saying that:

“I cannot mount the gibbet like a saint— my honesty is broke—  I am no good man. Nothing is spoiled by giving them this lie   that was not rotten long before.”

Though he is able to signal the confession document, he wouldn’t incriminate others within the false confession. “They think to go like saints I like not spoil their names.” His confession false or true, should concern himself, solely himself. When Danforth insists, John Proctor says, “I speak my own sins.” By signing the document, Proctor, with all his concern for name, tries to cover behind an official wall censure. When Danforth insists that his confession shall be nailed to the church door for public view, Proctor decides clearer than before. Either he should aspect with these he sought to defend, or be a accomplice to their prosecution. He is aware of he can’t buy his life by selling away his conscience. Once he’s proved incorrect, it will stand that others had been incorrect, and therefore described their destiny to be hanged. He realizes the implications of signing the confession on the non-public, private aspect, his causes are:

“I have three children- how may I teach them to walk like men in the world,   and sold my friends? Beguile me not! I blacken all of them when this is   nailed to the church the very day they hang for silence!”

The social implications are clearly said. John Proctor talks about why he wouldn’t permit the general public show of his confession:

“Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life!   Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the    dust on the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name?   I have given you my soul; leave me my name!”

Proctor realizes that personal integrity is in some way tied as much as a duty to a world that extends beyond him. From somebody who thought he was separate and on the heart of the universe, he’s transformed into a person who realizes that he’s an integral half of a big universe, with a function to carry out. If he indicators the confession and provides away his name in favor of life, he would meet the identical destiny, which overtook Eddie Carbone in A View from the Bridge. However, by sustaining his name and identification, Proctor can also be sustaining the names and identities of his colleagues, by endorsing the stand that they had taken.

John Proctor is working inside a distinct system of justice from the judicial system. He is revealing to the unwritten laws of conscience whereas the general public court, by its very nature, should keep publicity in its proceedings. Like Saint Joan in Bernard Shaw’s Saint Joan, Proctor recants as he involves terms along with his identification. Like Saint Joan, he is not going to betray the Saints and lend his name to the injustice of the court. His name is his conscience, his immortal soul, his identification.

As Proctor faces his death, he feels relieved that he has discovered his integrity. He now has his identification because the one verdict he has accepted is his personal verdict—a verdict of his conscience. He has grow to be true to himself. His spouse Elizabeth realizes this truism:

“But let none be your judge. There be no higher judge   under Heaven than Proctor is!”

The Crucible has been rightly thought of by critics as a successful tragedy. Proctor’s option to embrace demise moderately than buy life with a false confession is the disaster of the play. Moreover, his determination is preceded by agonizing soul looking out. Until the last moment of the play, he has an opportunity to save lots of himself. His choosing to die solutions the query, “What shall it profit a man if he shall gain the world and lose his own soul?” Proctor’s sufferings and death are undeserved and he reveals the strength of a moral conviction that may insurgent death.

Read About: Justify The Crucible as Modern Tragedy

The Crucible could be considered as a play of common significance. It is of significance at all times and is of specific significance to us at present. In the Preface to a different play, Miller refers back to the question whether or not one’s imaginative and prescient of truth should be a source of guilt at a time when the mass of men condemn it as a harmful and devilish lie. The braveness to face persecution and to die for one’s convictions is required in all ages. The play shouldn’t be obtrusively didactic. Nevertheless, it portrays with dignity and reference the martyrdom of excellent women and men for freedom of conscience.

In all the main plays of Miller together with The Crucible, the name is a symbol of one’s popularity and honesty. Miller had written a script for the radio entitled as “The Pussycat and the Plumber Who Was a Man”, at the start of his profession within the 1940’s which offers with the same topic. The dialogue of one of many characters, Tom Thomas, foregrounds certainly one of Miller’s main considerations, which he would develop in his mature works:

“… The one thing a man fears most next to death is the loss   of his good name. Man is evil in his own eyes, my friends,    worthless, and the only way he can find respect for himself   is by getting other people to say he’s a nice fellow.”

The desire of this respect is without doubt one of the causes of Proctor’s last choice. This concern chased Miller not solely on stage but in addition in his personal life. When hauled earlier than the House of Un-American Activities Committee, he was requested to name these whom he knew and had any link with Communist ideology. He was confronted, then, with a scenario just like Proctor’s.

Miller refused naming others and his response to the Chairman appears to paraphrase the expressions of his hero to Danforth when Proctor mentioned that he would communicate solely of his own sins and couldn’t judge others:

“I am not protecting the Communists or the Communist   Party. I am trying to, and 1will, protect my sense of myself.   I could not use the name of another person and bring trouble   on him … I take the responsibility for everything I have ever   done, but I cannot take responsibility for another human being.”

Miller had composed The Crucible three years before he was compelled to play in actual life the position of the character he created. The worth, Proctor attributes to his name in the long run of the play, is symbolically associated to the sense of Miller himself, to his family, his fellows, and even God. Until the end, Proctor makes an attempt to persuade himself that he was no saint, no good man, and subsequently, didn’t deserve the others’ respect. In the end of the play, nevertheless, he realizes that he does want it and recants his lie. With this act he commits himself to a cause, one thing that he has prevented since the starting of the play. The query of dedication turns into central within the dialogue of the play.

Actually, it appears troublesome for Proctor to suit right into a Manichean system just like the Puritan. He can’t tolerate hypocrites, however on the identical time doesn’t think about himself a saint, a religious person. At the end, he’s pushed into a choice. He needs to maintain neutral, however he comes to know that it isn’t possible. By telling a lie he can save his life, however with this action he shall be related to the hypocrites he hates. By telling the reality, he corroborates and assist the purity within the hearts of his neighbors and consequently his own. With both determination, he commits himself to 1 aspect. By telling the reality, based on Elizabeth, Proctor lastly features or finds his goodness. Proctor’s last alternative demonstrates Miller’s fixed endeavor to exhibit how the person is given, from integration along with his society, his cause for existence, his private significance, and his morality. Miller’s plays in a technique or one other foreground the facet of ethical duty. Proctor’s apathy shall be compelled to show into dedication.

In The Crucible, the battle shouldn’t be between the poor and the wealthy however between the authorities’ energy and the person’s conscience, a battle between a person’s actions and his conception of himself. Miller brings up the query of “whether conscience is in fact an organic part of the human being, and what happens when it is handed over not merely to the state or the mores of the time but to one’s friend or wife.”

Proctor’s terrible quest for his integrity carries on within the prison scene in Act 4. The nature of the attraction skilled by Proctor, who’s confronted with the imaginative and prescient of imminent death, is summed up by the logic of Hale’s phrases addressed to Elizabeth:

“Life, woman, life is God’s most precious gift; no principle,  however glorious, may justify the taking of it”

For a moment, Proctor seems satisfied of the worth of Hale’s argument. Proctor all of the sudden senses that he “cannot mount the gibbet like a saint.” He signs a prepared confession in an effort to save his life. However, as Danforth insists on making his confession a public doc, Proctor tears it up. Indignation compels him to save lots of self-respect, and embrace martyrdom. At this stage, Proctor shows a compelling concern for his “good name”—his character which has been situated by many critics as one of many working themes, which highlight the destiny of the protagonists in Miller’s social, performs, a concern which is equally vital for his twentieth-century characters like Willy Loman and Eddie Carbone. Proctor dies for his good name, whereas his victory over evil suggests us that that is the one plan of action open before a sincere man in such wrenching occasions.

Read About: Witch-Hunting or Witchcraft in The Crucible

Miller’s beliefs are an indictment of the time through which he was living. The political persecutions of the McCarthy period inspired the environment of alarm and concern, which he expresses in The Crucible. A scenario like this prompts the looks of males of magnitude, who struggle for their sense of an integral self, however on the identical time produces males able to sell no matter they’ve to save their skins, and their conscience is among the many objects for sale. Miller comments in regards to the horrors he noticed in his time. He states that above all, the one he thought-about worst is that he noticed “accepted the notion that conscience was no longer a private matter but one of state administration. I saw men handing conscience to other men and thanking other men the opportunity of doing so.” Miller doesn’t cover his intentions of an ethical renewal of his own nation, and consequently, the restoration of its liberal ideas. Such restoration, nevertheless, is to not begin with the authorities however with the person.

Finally, it’s noteworthy to emphasise the thought of the need of rigidity. When individuals need to bear their very own crucible, their actual self is revealed. When there may be solely a peaceful breeze, to which everyone seems to be used, the deepest needs and sins of the heart are hidden, however when God’s icy wind begins to blow they arrive to the floor, and we come to “know who is who”. In Proctor’s case, by his crucible, he got here to know who he was.

Suggestions? Share in the comment section.

And yes! if you need premium accounts at cheapest rate inbox me on my Facebook page at: Premium Palace

Subscribe my YouTube channel at: The Stream Post

Follow on Facebook page of Literature Times at: Literature Times on Facebook

And, if you want me to rewrite your blog post with 100% uniqueness, then contact me on Fiverr at: Shahireng

Related posts

Literature as Expression of Thoughts, Society and Life

4 Mins read
Introduction Literature is expression of thoughts, reflection of society and reflection of life. It contains the thoughts, reflections and observations of people…

Art for Life's Sake and Moral Purpose of Literature

3 Mins read
Introduction Some say ‘art for life’s sake’ and others say ‘art for moral purpose.’ But who is right? They both are, in…

Difference between Romanticism and Classicism

3 Mins read
Introduction Romanticism is a literary and artistic movement that originated in Europe towards the end of the 18th century. Romanticism was characterized…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.