Some say ‘art for life’s sake’ and others say ‘art for moral purpose.’ But who is right? They both are, in different ways. Reflection on the contradictions in meaning of art, and how being able to appreciate art for its own sake is something to be valued. Art should be for life’s sake and for moral purpose.
The Bible teaches us that our lives are not our own – we were bought with a price, and that our lives belong to Christ. In light of this teaching, the Christian artist has a double responsibility: to show people that there is something beyond this life worth living for, and to create art from the heart that glorifies God. This article will inform the reader about how art has both a moral purpose and for the sake of life.
It is not surprising that when asked to think about the purpose of literature, many people would answer “to entertain.” In some ways, they are right. Stories are meant to be enjoyable and engaging. They should be well written, thought-provoking, and interesting. However, a deeper reading reveals that art is meant for life’s sake and moral purposes.
What is Art for life’s sake?
“For life’s sake” can be interpreted in two ways. First, the art is created for the purpose of benefiting society. One way to do this is through moral instruction; art can inform citizens and help them understand what they should and shouldn’t do. Second, the art should also provide a pleasurable experience to those who view it.
Art for life’s sake is art that is made to be appreciated. In other words, art is supposed to give the viewer a good feeling. The artist might make something that looks beautiful so the viewer can enjoy it. The artist also might make something that interests the viewer. This could mean making an abstract painting or sculpture for someone who likes modern art. Art for life’s sake isn’t about moral purpose because this type of art does not have a message or meaning behind it.
The meanings of Arts
Arts are the expressions of skill, sensibility, and taste. As they’re created to be enjoyed, they create an emotional response in its viewers or listeners. It can also evoke a moral response when it conveys ideas such as justice and injustice or good and evil. For example, in Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar”, Brutus is a tragic hero who illustrates the moral values that oppose those of the tyrant.
Read About: Difference between Romanticism and Classicism
The Moral purposes of Art
Art is a powerful art form that can be used to express deep emotions, convey messages, and make people contemplate the meaning of life. It also has the ability to change how people feel when they see it or hear it. The power of art can be used for good or evil depending on the artist’s intentions.
The moral purpose of art in literature is an often debated topic, one that has been discussed by many greats over the years. With various views and arguments, I will provide a brief overview of this broad topic, explaining my own thoughts and providing some literary examples.
There is always a moral purpose in any story told. Each author tells a story with the intention of conveying some sort of moral message to their reader. Alice Walker’s “To hell with dying” discusses the moral purpose of art in literature.
The purpose and moral of Art, as stated by Aristotle, is
“To educate the senses, to provide a sense of pleasure, and to purify the emotions.”Aristotle
It is difficult to be concise about the moral purposes of Art. It is my argument that Literature should be about morality, and as such it should provide examples of moral judgement. This article will explore the moral purposes of Art in Literature with literary examples.
Every art form has a moral purpose. The moral purposes of art in literature is to entertain and make the audience feel feelings such as anger or sadness. The article provides an example from Austen’s Pride and Prejudice,
“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.”
Art has long been viewed as a moral purpose in itself. When we watch a play or read a book, we want to see the good guy win and the bad guy lose. Sometimes that’s not the case- Macbeth, for example- but sometimes you can feel a sense of satisfaction or righteous indignation at an artist’s portrayal of justice being served.
It’s important for artists to seek to make the world a better place in some way. It is also important for artists to be able to express themselves truthfully and authentically, without feeling that they have to write about something specific or limit themselves in any way.
Thoughts, feedback and suggestions? Share in the comment section
Get GPL WordPress Themes, Plugins and PHP scripts from GPL Palace
For free Udemy courses visit: Free Udemy Courses